On 27 January 2017, the Washington Post reported on the questions facing the Prime Minister as she prepared to meet with President Trump, including a parliamentary question on the topic from Andrew Tyrie.

On 26 January 2017, the Financial Times reported that the Prime Minister was under pressure to stand up to President Trump over his comments on torture, including through a parliamentary question from Andrew Tyrie.

On 17 January 2017, the Guardian reported that the Supreme Court had allowed an anti-Gaddafi dissident and his wife to bring their case against the British Government over its alleged role in their rendition to Libya.

On 5 November 2016, the Daily Mail reported on the APPG's correspondence with Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), over the Committee's inquiry into rendition.

On 25 July 2016, the Guardian reported on Andrew Tyrie's letter to the Intelligence and Security Committee, following the Crown Prosecution Service's decision not to bring criminal charges over renditions to Libya.

On 3 May 2016, the Independent reported on the disclosure -- as part of litigation by the APPG -- that the Foreign Office had asked the US Government not to release documents relating to the treatment of detainees.

On 10 December 2014, the Guardian reported on calls by Andrew Tyrie and others for Britain to hold a full inquiry into rendition, following the publication of the Senate Intelligence Committee's report on the programme.

On 2 August 2014, Andrew Tyrie published an article in the Independent calling on the UK Government to establish the scope and limits of its involvement in rendition.

Writing in the Independent on 22 December 2013, Andrew Tyrie argued that Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee may lack the tools to get to the truth about extraordinary rendition.

A report published on 16 April 2013 by the Constitution Project's Task Force on Detainee Treatment has strongly criticised Britain for colluding with the US in the torture and rendition of terror suspects.

On 26 March 2013, the Guardian reported on a pamphlet on the Justice and Security Bill, written by Anthony Peto QC and Andrew Tyrie MP, entitled "Still Neither Just Nor Secure", which argues that the Bill will make it more difficult to uncover the truth about Britain's role in extraordinary rendition.

On 21 March 2013, the Guardian published an article describing opposition in the House of Lords to the Justice and Security Bill.

On 4 March 2013, Anthony Peto QC responds to further arguments by Robert Buckland MP on the Justice and Security Bill.

In a Conservative Home blog post on 28 February 2013, Robert Buckland MP defended the Justice and Security Bill against criticism.

In a Conservative Home blog post on 25 February 2013, Anthony Peto QC rejects Robert Buckland's arguments in favour of the Justice and Security Bill.

In a Conservative Home blog post on 22 February 2013, Robert Buckland MP dismissed Andrew Tyrie's concerns about the Justice and Security Bill, which were set out in the Times the previous day.

In a Times article published on 21 February 2013, Andrew Tyrie responded to arguments made by Minister without Portfolio Kenneth Clarke about the Justice and Security Bill. 

In an article published by the Telegraph on 30 January 2013, Peter Oborne called on the Coalition Government to ditch the Justice and Security Bill.

On 28 January 2013, the Telegraph reported on warnings by Andrew Tyrie MP that the Government's proposals under the Justice and Security Bill would do more harm than good.

On 28 January 2013, the Spectator's Coffee House blog ran a post by Tim Knox, Director of the Centre for Policy Studies, on the publication of "Neither Just Nor Secure" by Anthony Peto QC and Andrew Tyrie MP, which calls for major changes to the Justice and Security Bill.